Planning plea19 Sep 2011

Transport concerns over planning proposals

RAC Foundation joins forces with transport charity to voice planning concerns

The RAC Foundation and Campaign for Better Transport have joined forces to express serious concerns about transport aspects of the Government’s new planning proposals.

The groups have written to Planning Minister Greg Clark to point out that the draft National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) could lead to out-of-town office developments which would create severe congestion. They are also worried that the NPPF would make it more difficult to prevent developments that would cause congestion and traffic jams and for councils to require a travel plan to mitigate the transport impacts.

The two organisations suggest several changes that should be made to the NPPF including:
•    There should be a presumption in favour of locating development next to existing public transport (or where it can be served by improved public transport). This would enable more cost-efficient development with less need for new infrastructure.
•    The impact of new developments on traffic and road congestion should be treated as a material consideration and therefore as grounds on which developments could be rejected or sites not designated for development in plans and strategies.
•    Linked to this, there should be a requirement for developers to assess the traffic and transport impacts and accessibility of their developments and produce a travel plan with measures to reduce impacts. This might include promoting remote working and multi-occupancy/pool cars as well as public transport. The requirement for this should not be left to local authorities as the draft suggests, though the formulation of the assessment/plan might be.
•    “Town centre first” policy should include commercial/office development as it did before.

Professor Stephen Glaister, Director of the RAC Foundation, said: “There is a real prospect that the National Planning Policy Framework, as currently drafted, will simply make conditions even worse on the roads and damage the interests of motorists. We need a Planning Framework which ensures that transport conditions improve rather than worsen.”

Stephen Joseph, Campaign for Better Transport’s chief executive, said: “It is vital that we have planning policies which don’t just add to congestion but instead give people a real choice about how they travel and even about whether they need to travel or not in the first place. Unless ministers reconsider their plans, the National Planning Policy Framework will mark a return to the worst aspects of 1980s car dependent planning.”

For further information please contact Alice Ridley, press officer at Campaign for Better Transport, on 020 7566 6483/07984 773 468, [email protected] or Philip Gomm, head of external communications at The RAC Foundation on 020 7747 3445/07711 776448, [email protected] 

Notes to Editors

1. The RAC Foundation is a charity which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and responsible road users. Independent and authoritative research, carried out for the public benefit, is central to the Foundation’s activities.

2. Campaign for Better Transport is the UK’s leading authority on sustainable transport. We champion transport solutions that improve people’s lives and reduce environmental damage. Our campaigns push innovative, practical policies at local and national levels. Campaign for Better Transport Charitable Trust is a registered charity (1101929).