Councils concerned about shortage of engineers
UPDATE 28 MARCH 2022 – CLARIFICATION FROM DORSET COUNCIL
Dorset council has been in touch to say that it incorrectly answered part of the FOI request we submitted to it. Instead of having 12 bridges collapse they in fact had no bridges collapse. Please read the release below with that in mind.
The number of substandard road bridges managed by councils across Great Britain has risen for the second year running.
At the same time council engineering experts are warning about a shortage of staff to carry out inspections to ensure the bridge stock remains safe and fit for use.
Local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales identified 3,211 bridges – defined by highway engineers as structures over 1.5m in span – as being substandard at the end of 2021.
(NB: the term ‘bridge’ in highway engineering encompasses major structures spanning estuaries through to stretches of road at least 1.5 metres in length such as might span a culvert carrying water under the carriageway.)
This is up 3.4% on the 3,105 figure twelve months previously, and up 5% on the 3,055 figure a year before that.
However, it is below the 3,194 total for 2018 and the 3,441 figure for 2017.
A substandard bridge means one unable to carry the heaviest vehicles now seen on our roads, including lorries of up to 44 tonnes. Many of the substandard bridges are subject to weight restrictions. Others will be under programmes of increased monitoring or even managed decline.
The analysis was carried out by the RAC Foundation which submitted FOI requests to 206 local highways authorities in November 2021.
The analysis is based on data provided by 196 councils (four fewer than the previous year) out of the 206 asked.
Between them the 196 councils are responsible for maintaining 70,944 bridges meaning 4.5% of the inventory disclosed is substandard.
Councils also reported that, at the time they responded at the end of 2021, 17 bridges including relatively short structures with a span of at least 1.5 metres had fully collapsed in the previous twelve months.
Of these 17 full collapses, 12 were in Dorset and 5 were in Denbighshire.
[See clarification at the top of this article.]
A further 37 had partially collapsed.
The 37 partial collapses were in: Denbighshire (17); Conwy (2); Perth and Kinross (2); Stirling (2); and Dorset, Aberdeenshire, Bolton, Buckinghamshire, East Dunbartonshire, East Riding of Yorkshire, Fife, Gwynedd, Merton, Newport, Peterborough, Shropshire, Staffordshire and Wrexham (1 each).
Between them, councils say they would ideally want to bring 2,374 (74%) of the 3,105 substandard bridges back up to full carrying capacity.
However, budget limitations mean they anticipate that only 379 of these will have the necessary work carried out on them within the next five years.
The estimated cost to bring all the substandard bridges back up to perfect condition is £1.16 billion (up slightly on the £992 million figure of a year earlier).
The study reveals that the one-time cost to clear the full maintenance backlog on all 70,944 bridges would be £5.44 billion.
The survey of local highways authorities was carried out by the RAC Foundation with the help of the National Bridges Group of ADEPT (the Association of Directors of Environment, Economics, Planning and Transportation).
The ten councils in Britain with the highest number of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Devon | 2,714 | 229 | 8% |
| Oxfordshire | 785 | 222 | 28% |
| Essex | 981 | 167 | 17% |
| Somerset | 1,499 | 128 | 9% |
| Cornwall | 1,009 | 124 | 12% |
| Suffolk | 1,447 | 120 | 8% |
| Northumberland | 978 | 99 | 10% |
| Gloucestershire | 822 | 91 | 11% |
| Lancashire | 1,476 | 78 | 5% |
| Aberdeenshire | 1,346 | 77 | 6% |
The ten councils in Britain with the highest proportion of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| Hartlepool | 35 | 16 | 46% |
| Kingston upon Thames | 11 | 4 | 36% |
| Waltham Forest | 50 | 17 | 34% |
| Oxfordshire | 785 | 222 | 28% |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| Brent | 40 | 9 | 23% |
| Conwy | 292 | 57 | 20% |
| Thurrock | 49 | 9 | 18% |
| Wolverhampton | 58 | 10 | 17% |
A full list of councils is available at the end of this press release, together with top ten tables for England, Scotland and Wales.
The RAC Foundation also asked the national roads authorities about their bridges:
| Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges | |
| Highways England | 9,399 | 77 | 1% |
| Transport Scotland | 2,612 | 39 | 1% |
| Welsh Assembly | 1,268 | 104 | 8% |
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said:
“Bridges, as defined by highway engineers, come in all shapes and sizes, from soaring structures that span rivers and cross estuaries, through the many modest bridges designed centuries ago for the horse and cart, right down to those that are little more than culverts carrying water under a carriageway. But even the failure of the shortest of these structures could mean a five-foot long gap in the carriageway, and even on relatively minor roads that can still be a headache, causing disruption and possibly a long diversion.
“What the data suggests is that councils have been fighting to hold their ground over the last five years. Whilst the increase in substandard bridges year-on-year is not huge the picture over the last five years looks more like flatlining than sustained improvement, and with the threat of more severe weather events linked to climate change that must be a worry for the overall resilience of our highway network.”
Kevin Dentith, chair of the ADEPT National Bridges Group, said:
“‘Bridges are an integral part of the highway network but most go unnoticed as they carry us safely over obstacles. To manage these assets, many of which are centuries old, requires competent bridge inspectors and engineers to carry out regular assessments and maintenance to ensure they remain fit for purpose. The shortage of experienced and qualified people to undertake these crucial duties is putting a huge strain on the bridges fraternity who are struggling to recruit and often have to resort to ‘growing their own’ through apprentice schemes which are excellent but clearly requires a great deal of time, commitment and training before the staff are proficient to carry out the tasks required.
“The incidence of bridge collapses that lead to personal injury and traffic disruption is thankfully low but unless more engineers and technicians are encouraged to join the industry and highway authorities receive appropriate funding from the Department for Transport we are at risk of seeing a higher number of bridge collapses than those identified in this year’s RAC Foundation survey.’
ENDS
Contact:
Philip Gomm – Head of External Communications – RAC Foundation
[email protected] | 07711 776448 | 020 7747 3445
Notes to editors:
The RAC Foundation is a transport policy and research organisation that explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users.
The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. All the Foundation’s work is available at: www.racfoundation.org
GB DATA
This is a link to the table giving substandard bridge data for all councils in Great Britain:
https://www.racfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/RAC_Foundation_Bridge_Maintenance_GB_2021.pdf
ENGLISH DATA
This is a link to the table giving substandard bridge data for councils in England only:
https://www.racfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/RAC_Foundation_Bridge_Maintenance_England_2021.pdf
[Please note the clarification at the top of this article.]
The ten councils in England with the highest number of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Devon | 2,714 | 229 | 8% |
| Oxfordshire | 785 | 222 | 28% |
| Essex | 981 | 167 | 17% |
| Somerset | 1,499 | 128 | 9% |
| Cornwall | 1,009 | 124 | 12% |
| Suffolk | 1,447 | 120 | 8% |
| Northumberland | 978 | 99 | 10% |
| Gloucestershire | 822 | 91 | 11% |
| Lancashire | 1,476 | 78 | 5% |
| Cumbria | 1,801 | 69 | 4% |
The ten councils in England with the highest proportion of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 4 | 2 | 50% |
| Hartlepool | 35 | 16 | 46% |
| Kingston upon Thames | 11 | 4 | 36% |
| Waltham Forest | 50 | 17 | 34% |
| Oxfordshire | 785 | 222 | 28% |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 4 | 1 | 25% |
| Brent | 40 | 9 | 23% |
| Thurrock | 49 | 9 | 18% |
| Wolverhampton | 58 | 10 | 17% |
| Essex | 981 | 167 | 17% |
SCOTTISH DATA
This is a link to the table giving substandard bridge data for councils in Scotland only:
https://www.racfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/RAC_Foundation_Bridge_Maintenance_Scotland_2021.pdf
The ten councils in Scotland with the highest number of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Aberdeenshire | 1,346 | 77 | 6% |
| Perth and Kinross | 847 | 50 | 6% |
| Fife | 397 | 48 | 12% |
| East Ayrshire | 381 | 39 | 10% |
| Highland | 2,010 | 39 | 2% |
| Scottish Borders | 1,197 | 29 | 2% |
| Argyll & Bute | 901 | 27 | 3% |
| South Lanarkshire | 774 | 23 | 3% |
| Stirling | 291 | 13 | 4% |
| Dumfries & Galloway | 740 | 10 | 1% |
The ten councils in Scotland with the highest proportion of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Dundee City | 31 | 4 | 13% |
| Fife | 397 | 48 | 12% |
| East Ayrshire | 381 | 39 | 10% |
| Perth and Kinross | 847 | 50 | 6% |
| Aberdeenshire | 1,346 | 77 | 6% |
| Glasgow City | 182 | 9 | 5% |
| Stirling | 291 | 13 | 4% |
| Falkirk | 224 | 8 | 4% |
| Argyll & Bute | 901 | 27 | 3% |
| South Lanarkshire | 774 | 23 | 3% |
WELSH DATA
This is a link to the table giving substandard bridge data for councils in Wales only:
https://www.racfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/RAC_Foundation_Bridge_Maintenance_Wales_20201.pdf
The ten councils in Wales with the highest number of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Conwy | 292 | 57 | 20% |
| Carmarthenshire | 799 | 50 | 6% |
| Powys | 1,399 | 47 | 3% |
| Monmouthshire | 400 | 22 | 6% |
| Gwynedd | 631 | 18 | 3% |
| Swansea | 156 | 12 | 8% |
| Cardiff | 113 | 11 | 10% |
| Newport | 65 | 11 | 17% |
| Denbighshire | 282 | 10 | 4% |
| Bridgend | 175 | 9 | 5% |
The ten councils in Wales with the highest proportion of substandard bridges are:
| Local Authority | Number of bridges | Number of substandard bridges | Proportion of substandard bridges |
| Conwy | 292 | 57 | 20% |
| Newport | 65 | 11 | 17% |
| Merthyr Tydfil | 37 | 4 | 11% |
| Cardiff | 113 | 11 | 10% |
| Swansea | 156 | 12 | 8% |
| Caerphilly | 117 | 8 | 7% |
| Carmarthenshire | 799 | 50 | 6% |
| Monmouthshire | 400 | 22 | 6% |
| Bridgend | 175 | 9 | 5% |
| Torfaen | 189 | 9 | 5% |